Curriculum Provider Index

    British Esports Federation

    National education federation
    United Kingdom
    Capability score70/100
    Strong83% of rubric verified

    Scored from 8 of 10 criteria with a public source. Last verified 2026-09-10.

    Best suited to

    UK schools and colleges wanting recognised esports qualifications, national competition and federation-backed resources.

    Score breakdown

    Scoring breakdown for British Esports Federation across every rubric criterion
    CriterionWeightLevelWhat the evidence shows
    External accreditationHas an independent body reviewed and rated the curriculum?15%3/4Scored: documented evidence. Fact: Pearson publishes BTEC esports qualifications and British Esports describes its education partnership. Interpretation: External awarding-body qualification framework meets 3; qualification approval is not a published curriculum pedagogy rating. Confidence: High. Source
    Curriculum depthIs there a full scheme of work, or a set of loose activities?15%4/4Scored: documented evidence. Fact: Level 2/3 pathways include defined units, outcomes and progression for secondary/post-16 learners. Interpretation: Multi-year qualification progression with age/level targeting meets 4 within this age range. Confidence: High. Source
    Student assessmentCan a teacher evidence what a student actually learned?10%4/4Scored: documented evidence. Fact: Pearson specification defines learning aims, assessment criteria, evidence and quality assurance for BTEC certification. Interpretation: Structured assessment leads to recognised qualification: meets 4. Confidence: High. Source
    Learning platformIs the content delivered through a real platform teachers can run?10%1/4Scored: documented evidence. Fact: Federation teacher resource library links teaching and support materials. Interpretation: Resource distribution meets 1; do not treat competition administration as learner-progress LMS. Confidence: Medium. Source
    Teacher supplyWho stands in front of the class?10%Not publishedNo public source found. This criterion is excluded from the score rather than marked as zero.
    Teacher trainingIs the school teacher trained to run the program independently?10%2/4Scored: documented evidence. Fact: Teacher resources include guidance and links to training/coaching learning. Interpretation: Teacher support/training exists; a sequenced assessed certification specifically for school staff was not established. Confidence: Low. Source
    Safeguarding and wellbeingIs student wellbeing built into the program, or bolted on?10%3/4Scored: documented evidence. Fact: Level 2 specification contains an esports health, wellbeing and fitness unit with learning and assessment criteria. Interpretation: Structured wellbeing teaching meets 3; separate external review of a dedicated wellbeing curriculum not established. Confidence: High. Source
    Delivery reachCan they actually deliver where the school is?8%2/4Scored: documented evidence. Fact: Core competition serves UK institutions; education offer supports school/college-led delivery. Interpretation: National multi-site delivery meets 2. International qualification availability does not prove global live teaching. Confidence: Medium. Source
    Pricing transparencyCan a school budget without a sales call?7%Not publishedNo public source found. This criterion is excluded from the score rather than marked as zero.
    Evidence of outcomesIs there published evidence the program works?5%2/4Scored: documented evidence. Fact: Federation publishes institutional uptake and education/learner case material. Interpretation: Case/adoption evidence meets 2, not systematic measured or independent outcome evaluation. Confidence: Medium. Source

    Something wrong or out of date?

    Entries change when the evidence changes. If a criterion is published somewhere we missed, send us the link and we will rescore it with a dated note.

    Submit a correctionVisit the British Esports Federation website