Curriculum Provider Index

    PlayVS / Gaming Concepts

    Curriculum and platform
    United States and Canada; digital curriculum available more broadly
    Capability score63/100
    Strong100% of rubric verified

    Scored from 10 of 10 criteria with a public source. Last verified 2026-09-10.

    Best suited to

    North American schools wanting classroom curriculum tied directly to a major scholastic competition platform.

    Score breakdown

    Scoring breakdown for PlayVS / Gaming Concepts across every rubric criterion
    CriterionWeightLevelWhat the evidence shows
    External accreditationHas an independent body reviewed and rated the curriculum?15%3/4Scored: documented evidence. Fact: County education resource identifies Gaming Concepts A-G approval and STEM.org accreditation/approval. Interpretation: Named external approval, but no published scored pedagogical review. Confidence: Medium. Source
    Curriculum depthIs there a full scheme of work, or a set of loose activities?15%3/4Scored: documented evidence. Fact: Courses span elementary, middle and high school; provider describes vertical alignment. Interpretation: Age-specific structured curriculum; full multi-year mapped progression not accessible in reviewed public materials. Confidence: Medium. Source
    Student assessmentCan a teacher evidence what a student actually learned?10%3/4Scored: documented evidence. Fact: Twenty-six-lesson media portfolio project supplies tutorials and project rubrics. Interpretation: Structured assessed portfolio meets 3; recognised completion certificate not established. Confidence: Medium. Source
    Learning platformIs the content delivered through a real platform teachers can run?10%3/4Scored: documented evidence. Fact: Blueprint is a teacher/student learning platform; portfolio course describes LMS setup. Interpretation: Operational learning delivery documented; specific teacher progress-dashboard evidence insufficient for 4. Confidence: Medium. Source
    Teacher supplyWho stands in front of the class?10%1/4Scored: documented evidence. Fact: Asynchronous Lead Instructor model uses video instruction; school staff facilitate. Interpretation: Recorded instruction supports staff but does not supply a live classroom teacher; level 1 applies to this documented package. Confidence: Medium. Source
    Teacher trainingIs the school teacher trained to run the program independently?10%2/4Scored: documented evidence. Fact: Package explicitly includes teacher professional development for launch and sustainability. Interpretation: Training availability documented, but detailed sequence and assessed certification not publicly established. Confidence: Medium. Source
    Safeguarding and wellbeingIs student wellbeing built into the program, or bolted on?10%3/4Scored: documented evidence. Fact: Gaming Concepts includes Mental Health Moments within a structured school course series. Interpretation: Structured embedded wellbeing lessons; exact independently reviewed wellbeing curriculum not verified. Confidence: Medium. Source
    Delivery reachCan they actually deliver where the school is?8%3/4Scored: documented evidence. Fact: Provider reports international curriculum use; media pathway is asynchronous. Interpretation: International digital access meets 3; does not establish global live instruction. Confidence: Medium. Source
    Pricing transparencyCan a school budget without a sales call?7%1/4Scored: documented evidence. Fact: Per-school unlimited-student pricing basis is stated; actual amount requires enquiry. Interpretation: Quote-only core package. Salary comparison is not a course price. Confidence: High. Source
    Evidence of outcomesIs there published evidence the program works?5%2/4Scored: documented evidence. Fact: Provider reports a five-year study and a JMIR self-esteem study; accessible pages give headline results only. Interpretation: Quantified provider-reported outcomes meet 2; original report, attribution and methods not verified, so no independent-evaluation 4. Confidence: Low. Source

    Something wrong or out of date?

    Entries change when the evidence changes. If a criterion is published somewhere we missed, send us the link and we will rescore it with a dated note.

    Submit a correctionVisit the PlayVS / Gaming Concepts website